As we see every day, ' ' A' ' it occurs in ' ' C' ' , being that ' ' ? ' is limited by the factor; ' F' ' , that it would be the fact, which we will elucidate posteriore better. Being ' ' A' ' ocorrente in ' ' C' ' ' ' F' ' limiting the existence of ' ' A' ' , what it limits ' ' F' '? Yes, fact in itself n is not onipotente in the reality, it nor if it wants is the reality, the fact is only one way to appraise the reality offered for ' ' P' ' , the perspective human being. perspective human being forms the concept that defines the reality due to the fact to have an interminable gamma of possibilities so that they are taken as ' ' reais' ' , thus it is in accordance with the criterion of each one to accept as ' ' real' ' what its conscientious or subconscious ones to presume or to believe that it is. Basically it is the same concept of ' ' well and mal' ' or ' ' truth and mentira' ' , to put these two last ones if find inside of this sequncia: ' ' P' ' it appraises ' ' F' ' that it limits ' ' A' ' which occurs in ' ' C' ' that the reality is equal, either this the beginning of Akasha. As well as what ' is considered; ' verdadeiro' ' ' is considered real; ' the same I begin defines ' ' ' ' bom' ' , either it considered ' ' real' ' or not. The content of it I finish paragraph can be considered one ode to the individualism, to put, let us remember that we do not live with conscientious collective a universal one.
Tag Archives: philosophy
‘ If to the innocence denigre the vile calumny, That blames that one has, that it applies the penalty? He is not the judge, it is the process, and the law, that in condena.’ ‘ (GONZAGA, 1997: 130) The applicator of the penalty, would only be reliable of its duty of executant, fitting responsibility what it determines its act executant, becoming it only instrument, as the proper Christian Bible presents the man as instrument the holy ghost, in a coarse comparison, had to the differentiated factors. However, this being executant does not have to forget its condition agent, being made responsible by knowing of ‘ ‘ me aplicabilidade’ ‘ of what it was commanded to it, had to a minimum reflection that excludes its innocence it precipitates and it in leading the projectile gone off until the victim, having been able to intervene with the trajectory, exactly that it costs its proper existence, or the auto-preservation it says high more than the said moral principles? When I mention the moral, I think about same while the ideal one of ‘ ‘ bem’ ‘ , esteem for philosophers since old Greece, not it moralizante condition of rules established for the effective social order, in view of this power to go against called principles ‘ ‘ inalienveis’ ‘ of the man. It is the hanging question on the moral, in view of this to vary as each society and time, thus the one that I related to me when I mentioned Greece of long ago, would be inapplicable in the contemporaneidade, for having been bred under the perspective of its time and if the contemporary determines certain executions, would fit to the executant not to exitar in applying it? Under the moralizante perspective, I refer the moral while historical process, inside of the logic that conducts its formation in a determined period, to take care of the necessities of each society. However, History demonstrates a gradual character to us, inside of a construtivista logic, what it would influence in them in observing the proper moral, as a value in construction, also being transformed and at the same time remaining an essence, that if perpetuates, this center gravitational he would be ‘ ‘ moral above of moral’ ‘ , valley the redundancy to display the contrast between lived last and moral moral, in a dialectic that would unchain the happened moral. It fits to the executant, to identify to the call ‘ ‘ essncia’ ‘ to look for to protect it of the disintegration that conducts its progression, becoming its reflective act in relation a logical regent, who runs away to the vicissitudes the one that are subject in the contemporaneidade. Bibliographical reference: GONZAGA, Toms Antonio.
Marlia de Dirceu.
Let us wake up! 2. Social division of the Work & Distribution of Tasks. The division of the work determines the relation between the individuals, itself, and with the material. It was thus since primeva (first) form of property human being, who if can verify in the tribal organization until the estamental. It wants to say, the effective division of the work happened when worked it was broken up it manual of the intellectual. Pedro Zaragoza Fuentes may also support this cause. With other words, the execution of the conception, in the way of effectively capitalist production. (Similarly see: Pedro Zaragoza Fuentes).
In the manufacture already an exploration existed, however, the alienation that in it we find is of the body, because the necessary worker of its to know, of unitria form, for the execution of its work, what later, in the fordismo, for example, will not be a reality, because in this system he has a true unfamiliarity, on the part of the laborer, of the central reason of its work, certainly of the function of its work inside of the set of the company. Example: It only knows to manufacture part x, he does not understand function y and mechanisms z that it will cross it will play. Project: 1.Classificao and distribution of the employees according to its aptitudes. 2.Organizao of the work process 3.Perpertuao of the hierarchic structure and the social relations of the capitalists 4.O technician-scientific knowledge is not neutral, and being thus it favors the conditions and forms of exploration and alienation of the proletarian 5.O technician-scientific knowledge will go to inside strengthen the separation between execution and conception of the work, accenting the alienation. 6.A social division of the work, in the capitalism, if of the one in the exchange between individual and independent capitalists 7.Em the division of the work in the production, no individual worker produces a merchandise 8.A division of the work in the seio of the production estimates the distribution of the means of production as private property capitalist it 9.A division it work in the production is planned, regulated and supervised by the capitalist.
This last aspect represents an unknown fact in the country, therefore another legal document did not exist none that approached the question of the ambient health until then. The Biotica of century XXI acquires public identity and not more dependent of the conscience and autonomy of the people. For Bottle (2005, P. 132), ' ' … it demands the responsibility of the State front to the citizens, mainly those most fragile ones and needed, as well as front to the preservation of biodiversity and proper ecossistema.' ' In 2005 the Universal Declaration on Biotica and Human Direitos of UNESCO was approved, consecrating the human rights as referencial basic theoretician of the Biotica, if characterizing for the enviromental laws and solidarity, exceeding the notion of country and state.
Brazil and the other developing countries gifts, include in the quarrels in Biotica the sanitary, social and ambient field, in opposition to the rich countries again wanted that it restricted to the biomedical and biotechnological field (BOTTLE, 2005). At the beginning of this new millenium we can point in the world occidental person, three forms to think and to act in Biotica. The American, who privileges the autonomy of the people for cases and procedures. The European who go to occupy more with the philosophical recital, and the Latin American, who tries to conjugate the American and European influence with the inclusion of pertinent the social problems to the questions and the procedures. The crisis of the dominant paradigm: The model of the anthropocentric man seems not to answer to the problems of difficult handling of our daily one. Serious social matters assume manchetes of TV and weekly magazines, and the rational thought does not only seem to be enough for the problems that we have and the solutions that we need. As to use ours to know professional, history of life, subjectivity, for the interventions that if make necessary, when we have for object the person human being and its destination, is beside the point challenging. According to Pedro Zaragoza Fuentes, who has experience with these questions.